Love Lane (Thames Street)
In early modern London, there were several streets with the name Love Lane,
although the exact number of them varies from account to account. Today,
there are numerous streets with variations on the name Love Lane. Eilert
Ekwall, in his dictionary of the City of London, lists four such streets,
one in Aldermanbury Gap in transcription. Reason: Editorial omission for reasons of length or relevance. Use only in quotations in born-digital documents.[…] another in Colem[an] St Gap in transcription. Reason: Editorial omission for reasons of length or relevance. Use only in quotations in born-digital documents.[…] a third in Bill[ingsgate Ward] Gap in transcription. Reason: Editorial omission for reasons of length or relevance. Use only in quotations in born-digital documents.[…] and a fourth in St. Christopher [Broad Street], now lost(Ekwall 165). Gertrude Burford Rawlings suggests that there are
ten Love Lanes in the London district [i.e., Greater London], two Love Courts and one Love Walk(73). The modern London A-Z lists twelve Love Lanes in the index, four Lovers Walks, and one Love Walk (241). This page will focus on Love Lane (Thames Street), in Billingsgate Ward, but will also contrast this street with the reputation of the various other Love Lanes.
Love Lane (Thames Street) was situated
within Billingsgate Ward (or
Belingsgate) (Hughson 91). Billingsgate Ward is two wards to the west of the Tower of London. The Agas map shows that the lane goes from north to south—up to St. Andrew Hubbard and down to Thames Street. It runs parallel to the streets St. Mary at Hill Street and Botolph Lane. Stow records its location as follows:
next out of Thames Streete is Lucas [Love] lane, and then Buttolph lane, and at the North end thereof Philpot lane, then is Rother lane, of olde time so called, and thwart the same lane is little Eastcheape, and these be the bounds of Billinsgate warde(Stow 1:206). The street is included in the Parish of St. Mary-at-Hill, or
St. Mary atte Hilleaccording to the spelling of a 1458 record (Harben 371).
According to Henry Harben, the earliest mention of Love Lane (Thames Street) was in 1394, when it was referred to as
having formerly been called
Roppelaneor
Roperelane(371). In A Survey of London, Stow likewise states that the lane was
of old time called Roape lane, [and] since called Lucas laneafter an owner of nearby land, and then
corruptly called Loue Lane(Stow 1:210). This emphasis on the name being corrupt is of note. Stow refuses to refer to the lane by its contemporary name, continuing instead to use the archaic
Lucas Lane.This insistence on the older name mirrors the nostalgia of Stow’s text. In contrast, James Howell’s Londonopolis (1657) records that the lane went from being named
Rope-lane,to
Lucas lane,to
Love lanewithout commenting that this latest change was
corrupt(86).
The use of the name Lucas Lane
cannot be traced to any early records, suggesting that perhaps Stow might be
mistaken in his record that the lane was rightfully called
Lucas Lane,and then
corruptlycalled Love Lane (Thames Street) (Harben 371). Further substantiating this claim is the evidence that the lane was in fact called Love Lane (Thames Street) in the early records. One theory is that the name was changed from
Roperto
LoveLane around 1377. At that time,
in an ordinance for safeguarding the City, the Alderman of Billygnes-gate Ward was to guard the wharf of Reynold Love up to Billings-gate(Harben 371). Harben suggests that the name was changed at this time in honour of the Love family, who were likely wealthy members of the ward (371).
However, there are other hypotheses about the origin of the name
Love.Harben records that it could have been named after John Lovekyn, then
contracted into Lukin, and Lukins, and later converted into Lucas(371). This evidence suggests that Billingsgate Ward’s Love Lane (Thames Street) has a different etymology than other Love Lanes in London. This research is significant for the lane’s reputation, because other Love lanes were so named for their brothels:
in the Middle Ages the wanton women of the City gathered in [Love Lane near Aldermanbury], seeking customers, and the street thereby acquired its name(Smith 129). Similarly, The London Encyclopedia cites the latter Love Lane as having been
a haunt of prostitutes in the Middle Ages(Weinreb and Hibbert 485). Gillian Bebbington in London Street Names corroborates this point, citing Stow in her description of Love Lane between Wood Street and Aldermanbury as a place frequented by
wantons(206).
Although a sordid reputation attaches to Love Lane in Cripplegate
Ward, many scholars argue that all Love Lanes should not be regarded
as sharing a similarly infamous history. For example, Rawlings states that
we may well believe that Stow’s explanation does not fit them alland hypothesizes that
many, no doubt, were named from innocent everyday romances(73). Ekwall corroborates Rawlings’ assertion, suggesting that while
the name Gap in transcription. Reason: Editorial omission for reasons of length or relevance. Use only in quotations in born-digital documents.[…] is generally held to refer to houses of ill fame Gap in transcription. Reason: Editorial omission for reasons of length or relevance. Use only in quotations in born-digital documents.[…] the name may have a more innocent connotation, at least in some cases(166). Ekwall points out that streets called Love Lane in Swedish towns
exclude the coarser meaningand instead suggest a
lane where loving couples are wont to walk(166). He extends this theory to the Love Lanes in London, and considers Billingsgate Love Lane to have this more innocent origin.
After the early modern period, Love
Lane is mentioned in a 1683 text entitled An
invitation to Mr. John Garlick’s houſe at the sign of the George in Love-Lane near Billingſgate, to the eating of a diſh of meat,
called a Spanish oleo. Written by Richard Gibbs, it is a comical
poem entreating readers to partake in a fine meal:
. From this poem, it seems that Love Lane (Thames Street) was the site of at least one tavern in the post-fire London of the later seventeenth century.(Gibbs recto)Come to the George you Epicurean CrewThat love good Eating, there’s a Diſh that’s New Gap in transcription. Reason: Editorial omission for reasons of length or relevance. Use only in quotations in born-digital documents.[…]’tis an OLEO, a more Spermatick Meat,Not fit for every Son of Truckle Bed,Incipit, Dull, Illiterate Logerhead
In 1774, during excavations undertaken on Love Lane (Thames Street) for the building of a sugar warehouse, pieces of Roman
bricks and ancient Saxon coins were found (Harben 371). In The Annual Register, or,
A View of the History and Politics of the Year 1851, it is
recorded that a
calamitous fire in the citystarted on
Love Lane, Lower Thames Streetin the early morning at the
well-knowntavern called the Rose and Crown, at no. 17 Love Lane (Thames Street) (68). Love Lane was eventually shortened so that Monument Street could be formed (Harben 371).
The modern travel book The Rough Guide to
London indicates that Love
Lane became Lovat Lane after
1939. It also highlights St. Mary-at-Hill on Lovat Lane,
which was rebuilt by Christopher Wren
after London’s Great Fire in 1666 (Humphreys
211). The travel writer describes the lane as
one of the City’s most atmospheric cobbled streets, once renowned for its brothels( 211). Interestingly, this statement contradicts what the aforementioned scholars suggest about this street. Although The Rough Guide is not a scholarly source, it may inadvertently deliver a grain of truth. Kingsford’s gloss on Love Lane (Thames Street) cites a 1428 source that mentions a building thereon called
le Stuehous,which demonstrates the lane’s connection with
wantons,he argues (Kingsford 2.311). Stew is an obsolete term for a brothel. The Oxford English Dictionary entry records that in 1436 the word Stywehouses was used to describe
houses of Bordell(OED stew-house, n.). Although scholarly opinion tends to concur that Love Lane (Thames Street) did not take its name from a seedy reputation as a place of prostitution, it seems from the evidence Kingsford cites that the lane may still have housed one or more of the city of London’s many brothels.
See also: Chalfant 122.
References
-
Citation
Bebbington, Gillian. London Street Names. London: B.T. Batsford, 1972. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Big London Street Atlas. London: Geographers’ A–Z Map Company, 2004. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Chalfant, Fran C. Ben Jonson’s London: A Jacobean Placename Dictionary. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1978. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Ekwall, Eilert. Street-Names of the City of London. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Gibbs, Richard. An invitation to Mr. John Garlick’s houſe at the sign of the George in Love-Lane near Billingſgate, to the eating of a diſh of meat, called a Spanish oleo. London: J.R., 1683. Wing G665.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Harben, Henry A. A Dictionary of London. London: Herbert Jenkins, 1918. [Available digitally from British History Online: https://www.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/dictionary-of-london.]This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Howell, James. Londinopolis, an historicall discourse or perlustration of the city of London, the imperial chamber, and chief emporium of Great Britain whereunto is added another of the city of Westminster, with the courts of justice, antiquities, and new buildings thereunto belonging. London, 1657. Wing H3090.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Hughson, David. London; Being an Accurate History and Description of the London Metropolis and its Neighbourhood to Thirty Miles Extent, from an actual Perambulation. 8 vols. London: W. Stratford, Crown Court, Temple Bar, 1806. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Humphreys, Rob. The Rough Guide to London. London: Rough Guides, 2003. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Kingsford, Charles Lethbridge, ed. A Survey of London by John Stow. Reprinted from the Text of 1603. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1908. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford UP. https://www.oed.com/.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Rawlings, Gertrude Burford. The Streets of London: Their History and Associations. London: Geoffrey Bles, 1926. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Smith, Al. Dictionary of City of London Street Names. New York: Arco, 1970. Print.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Stow, John. A Survey of London. Reprinted from the Text of 1603. Ed. Charles Lethbridge Kingsford. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1908. See also the digital transcription of this edition at British History Online.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
The Annual Register, or, A View of the History and Politics of the Year 1851. London, 1851. Remediated by Internet Archive.This item is cited in the following documents:
-
Citation
Weinreb, Ben, and Christopher Hibbert, eds. The London Encyclopaedia. New York: St. Martin’s P, 1983. Print. [You may also wish to consult the 3rd edition, published in 2008.]This item is cited in the following documents: