Copyright held by
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Further details of licences are available from our
Licences page. For more
information, contact the project director,
Born digital.
Pudding Lane is most famously known as the
starting point of the Great Fire of 1666. Pudding Lane ran south from Little Eastcheap down to Thames Street, with New Fish Street
(Newfyshe Streat) framing it on the west and
Botolph Lane on the east. The only
intersecting street on Pudding Lane is St. George’s Lane, and the nearby parishes include
St. Margaret (New Fish Street), St.
Magnus, St. Botolph (Billingsgate), St. George (Botolph Lane), and St.
Leonard (Eastcheap). On Ekwall’s map it is labeled as Rother (Pudding) Lane
after
Most MoEML documents, or significant fragments with mol:
prefix and accessed through the web application
with their id + .xml
.
The molagas prefix points to the shape representation of a location on MoEML’s OpenLayers3-based rendering of the Agas Map.
Links to page-images in the Chadwyck-Healey
Links to page-images in the
The mdt (MoEML Document Type) prefix used on
The mdtlist (MoEML Document Type listing) prefix used in linking attributes points to a listings page constructed from a category in the central MDT taxonomy in the includes file. There are two variants, one with the plain _subcategories
, meaning all subcategories of the category.
The molgls (MoEML gloss) prefix used on
This molvariant prefix is used on
This molajax prefix is used on
The molstow prefix is used on
The molshows prefix is used on
The sb prefix is used on
Our editorial and encoding practices are documented in detail in the Praxis section of our website.
Pudding Lane is most famously known as the
starting point of the Great Fire of 1666. The origin of its name is contested by
historians but is most likely consistent with
Then haue yee one other lane called Rother Lane, or Red Rose Lane, of such a signe there, now commonly called Pudding Lane, because the Butchers of Eastcheape haue their skalding House for Hogges there, and their puddinges [entrails] with other filth of Beastes, are voided downe that way to theyr dung boates on the Thames(Stow 1:210–211). Henry A. Harben, Gillian Bebbington, and Ben Weinreb and Christopher Hibbert support
guts and entrails(Weinreb and Hibbert 625). Edward Waterhouse introduces Pudding Lane as
a place so called, but for some eminent seller or sellers of Puddings living of old there, it being a regular practice to name streets after that which was produced or sold in the vicinity (as in Bread Street, Milk Street, and Candlewick Street). He dubs pudding
the general beloved diſh of Engliſh men(Waterhouse sig. C8r-C8v).
Pudding Lane ran south from Little Eastcheap down to Thames Street, with New Fish Street
(Newfyshe Streat) framing it on the west and
Botolph Lane on the east. The only
intersecting street on Pudding Lane is St. George’s Lane, and the nearby parishes include
St. Margaret (New Fish Street), St. Magnus, St. Botolph (Billingsgate), St. George (Botolph Lane), and St.
Leonard (Eastcheap). On Ekwall’s map it is labeled as Rother (Pudding) Lane
after
Eastcheap (the eastern counterpart to Westcheap, to build a
bridge over the Thames with houses thereon,
whence they might cast offal into the Thames at ebb-tide
(Harben).
In chiefly inhabited by Basketmakers, Turners and
Butchers
(Stow 1:211). Waterhouse,
writing later in the seventeenth century, remarks that people of labour and
poor condition ply
in this pittyful lane
, working early in the morning and
late at night when the Tyde serves to bring up Fishermen, Passengers, and other
Boats and Portages
. They would then sell their puddings, hoping to bring the
place in request
with travelers (Waterhouse sig.
C8v). Al Smith remarks that the butchers have since relocated to Smithfield and Leadenhall markets (164–65), a progression that likely began in the late seventeenth and
early eighteenth centuries.
The Great Fire began on Sunday, 2 September 1666 at around 2 a.m. in the house
of Thomas Farriner (also Farryner), the King’s baker, at a site which is now
occupied by 25 Pudding Lane
(Smith 164–65). Due to a strong eastern wind, the
flames spread quickly throughout the city and raged until Thursday 6 September,
a full four days later, having consumed 89 churches, 13,200 houses and 400
streets (145–46). The fire proceeded
south from Pudding Lane towards the bridge, where
it crossed Thames Street, ignited St. Magnus Church, destroyed London Bridge, and then blew north again, heading
westward down Thames Street (Vincent sig. E3v-E4r). Major buildings destroyed
included St. Paul’s Cathedral, 52 of the livery
company halls, the Guildhall, the Custom House, the Royal
Exchange, Newgate prison, Bridewell, and the compters at Wood Street and Poultry (Porter).
There have been many speculations about who started the fire and how it began but none has been sufficiently proven. Robert Hubert, an alleged arsonist, was one of many accused of the crime. He confessed to launching fireballs at Farriner’s house but his story was unconvincing and he was thought to be deranged. Nevertheless, he was hanged at Tyburn on 27 October (Porter). For many years, the Great Fire was considered a Catholic act of rebellion, potentially connected to the Gunpowder Plot of 5 November 1605. Thomas Vincent (1634–78) gives the following account, seeing the disaster as an opportunity to spread hatred of the Catholic religion to younger generations of Londoners:
this doth smell of a Popish design so hatcht in the same place where the Gunpowder plot was contriv’d, only that this was more successful. The world sufficiently knows how correspondent this is to Popish principles and practises; those, who could intentionally blow up King and Parliament by Gunpowder, might (without any scruple of their kinds of conscience) actually burn an heretical City (as they count it) into ashes: for besides the Dispensations they can have from his Holiness, or rather his Wickedness the Pope, for the most horrid crimes of Murder, Incest, and the like; It is not unlikely but they count such an action as this meritorious (in their kind of merit)Vincent sig. E4r-E4vI believe that the people will now take more heed of them and their waies; and instead of promoting their cause, I hope that a contrary effect is produced; and that the before Indifferency of a generation more newly sprung up, who did not know them, is now turned into loathing and detestation of such a religion, as can allow of such practices.
Waterhouse cites one of the major causes of the fire’s spread: the sheer volume
of combustible materials surrounding the site, including a Bakers stack of wood
in the house, and [in] all the neighbouring houses
, an Inn on New Fish Street Hill full of Hay and other
combustibles
, and finally a lodge on Thames
Street filled with Oyl, Hemp, Flax, Pitch, Tar, Cordage, Hops, Wines,
Brandies, and other materials favourable to Fire
(Waterhouse sig. C8v-D1r). Farriner maintained that it was not
negligence on his part that began the fire (Porter), and a committee set up to discover the cause concluded it
was a combination of a very dry season, a great easterly gale, and an Act of God
(Smith 145–46). Other contributing
factors were failure to isolate the fire by demolishing the surrounding
houses
, the densely packed district
, and fewer early morning witnesses than
there would have been on a weekday (Porter).
Pudding Lane has been mentioned in some monumental literary works. Andrew Marvell’s poem
Marvell sig. B3rFOR Faults and Follies London’s Doom ſhall fix, And She muſt ſink in Flames in Sixty ſix; Fire-Balls ſhall fly, but few ſhall ſee the Train, As far as from White-hall to Pudding-Lane, To burn the City, which again ſhall riſe, Beyond all hopes, aſpiring to the Skies.
The lane appeared in dramatic works as well. For instance, the character Touch of Nahum Tate’s farce
blind Tap-housein Pudding Lane (Tate sig. E4v). The following exchange in John Foxe’s
Foxe sig. 4C5vHaukes: Be you not a Hosier, and dwell in pudding lane? M Hug: Yes that I am, and there I do dwell. Haukes: It would seeme so, for ye can better skill to eate a pudding and make a hose then in Scripture eyther to answere or oppose.
Finally, John Griggs (1551/2–1598), a carpenter who built The Rose theatre for
See also: Chalfant 144.