Ram Alley "geometry": { "type": "LineString", "coordinates": [ [-0.109291,51.514055], [-0.109214,51.513846] ] }

Location

Ram Alley, a mere seven feet wide, ran southwards from Fleet Street, opposite Fetter Lane. Its end point was a footway between two legal institutions: the Inner Temple and Serjeants Inn. Edward H. Sugden also mentions that the street was well known as the rear exit from another inn, the Mitre, which fronted onto Fleet Street.

Etymology

The alley was named after an inn, marked by the sign of the Star and Ram, which had originally belonged to the Knights Hospitallers but was confiscated by Henry VIII. It was taken in fee from the monarch for £54 by Robert Harrys, or Harris, and became the site of his brewery, which had a frontage on Fleet Street (Bell 247). The alley is now known as Hare Place, named after Hare House (Paige letter #154).

Map Views

An unlabelled alley in the correct location as Ram Alley appears on the Agas map. The alley is marked on both the Ogilby and Morgan map of 1676 and the Rocque map of 1746.

The Ogilby and Morgan map (1676), showing Ram Alley (labelled k40). Image courtesy of (BHO).

The Rocque map (1676), showing Ram Alley. Image courtesy of .

Significance

Ram Alley was a place of sanctuary for criminals. Those seeking to evade capture would run into Ram Alley, which, like the Whitefriars nearby, still claimed right of sanctuary: that is, the immunity from arrest. A 1603 source cited by William Kent comments that there is a door leading out of Ram Alley to the tenement called the Miter in Fleet-streete, by which means thereof such persons as do frequent the house upon search made after them are conveyed out that way (Kent 494). The freedom was requested under common law by several of the London liberties, many of which were formerly monastic land.Mary Bly discusses right of sanctuary granted to the monastic liberties by Henry VIII. In an area known from the seventeenth century as Alsatia,See of Bell’s , which examines the area’s history as a place of sanctuary and the use of this cant name. In 1688, Thomas Shadwell wrote a popular play set in the area called . See also John Levin’s blog. Ram Alley was particularly renowned as a place of refuge for those in debt, and was the resort of sharpers and necessitous persons of very ill fame, and of both sexes (Nares 719). Even in 1640, a debtor taking refuge in Ram Alley was considered by his creditor beyond pursuit ( February 20). Sugden notes, [i]t was a place of evil reputation, inhabited chiefly by cooks, bawds, tobacco-sellers, and ale-house keepers and adds that [t]he worst of its dens was the Maidenhead, near the Temple end of it (Sugden 426). Walter George Bell calls it Ram Alley of evil association, perhaps the most pestilent court in London (Bell 252). Perhaps this unsavoury reputation is why it is not mentioned by John Stow in .

Parish records show a fear that the alley should become a refuge of the poor, with residents taking in unwelcome lodgers—particularly foreigners—into their midst. One such incident is noted in the wardmote inquests of the Parish of St. Dunstan in the West from 1598: Item, we present Margaret Lylly, who came to dwell in Ram Alley within three months last past and lodgeth one Symon Dominico, a frenchman borne and his wife in her house, who are like to be a charge to the p’ishe and the cittie (, 1598 qtd. in Bell 244).

Literary References

Title page of Lording Barry’s (1607-8). Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

The eponymous setting of a comic play, Ram Alley’s famous inns were invoked by Lording Barry, who juxtaposes them with its lawyers and prostitutes. Written in 1607-8, the play was performed by the short-lived Children of the King’s Revels company, based in the theatre at Whitefriars and funded by a group of investors including Barry.For more information about the Children of the King’s Revels, and the typicality of Ram Alley in that company’s repertoire, see Bly (2000). In the play, Throat, a dubious man of law who perhaps has his qualification from an Inn of Chancery, comments on the conjunction of food, drink and legal work: And though Ramme ſtinks with Cookes and ale, / Yet ſay thers many a worthy lawyers chamber, / Buts vpon Rame-alley (Barry sig. C1v). Later, he makes reference to the predatory sexuality for which the area was also known, demanding, Will you be gon directly, are you mad? Come you to ſeeke a Virgin in Ram-alley Soe neere an Inne of Court, and amongſt Cookes, Ale-men, and Landreſſes, why are you fooles?Barry sig. E4v Elizabeth Hanson comments on the play’s geographical and social specificity (Hanson 233), but, in his essay on the relationship between the audience and actors in the play, Jeremy Lopez nuances this point, arguing that the play seems to be about being in Ram Alley, but it’s really about its spectators knowing that they’re not (Lopez 202). He suggests that the play portrays the area and uses its stereotypical attributes to appeal to those playgoers who lived in the city but outside the area of the Whitefriars itself.

The alley is referred to by several other contemporary writers, who also focus on its key associations. The alley’s reputation as a place to flee the forces of the law is again shown in Richard Brome’s , where the spendthrift nephew, Careless, takes sanctuary from his uncle and other creditors in Ram Alley. Having got hold of money, he announces, I need no more inſconſing now in Ram-alley, nor the Sanctuary of White-fryers, the Forts of Fullers-rents, and Milford-lane, whoſe walls are dayly batter’d wth the curſes of bawling creditors (Brome sig. C8r), giving a list of places where men could evade pursuit. In , Brome continues the association of Ram Alley with sanctuary, as Bumpsey, looking for his son-in-law, enters the alley to seek information: Ille but ſtep up / Into Ram-Alley-Sanctuary, to Debtor, / That praies and watches there for a Protection (Brome, E4r).

The Rabelaisian account of the area in (1673) by writer and bookseller Richard Head also focuses on the alley’s reputation as a refuge from pursuit. The supposed writer of the work explains its origins in a period of forced inertia in Ramallia, or Villa Franca, a Sanctuary to all perſons whatſoever (Head sig. A2v). It was, he tells his reader in a prefatory epistle, an account of an imaginary journey pen’d laſt long Vacation, when all I had to do, was to hide my ſelf from the Inquiſition of my cruel Creditors; for which purpoſe I lodg’d in Ram-alley (Head sig. A2r).

Lithograph of Ram Alley from Stapleton (1924).

Writing the satirical seventy years before Richard Head’s, the students of St John’s College, Cambridge, associate the alley with the belligerence and linguistic directness of playwright John Marston, who lived as a legal student in the Middle Temple nearby: [Marston] Cutts, thruſts, and foines at whomeſoeuer he meets, And ſtrowes about Ram-ally meditations. Tut, what cares he for modeſt cloſe coucht termes, Cleanly to gird our looſer libertines? sig. B2v

The association of the alley with food and drink is demonstrated by Ben Jonson’s Lickfinger, the thieving cook in , who is labelled mine old hoſt of Ram-Alley (Jonson 2D2v). In Philip Massinger’s , this connection with food is again linked to the quotidian practices of nearby lawyers when Amble says of Marrall, the attorney: [t]he knaue thinkes ſtill hee’s at the cookes ſhop in Ramme-alley, / Where the Clarkes diuide and the Elder is to chooſe (Massinger sig. E2v). Thomas Nashe, in his , shows that the association with food could be combined with the alley’s reputation for roguery: but let the fiſh-wiues take heede, for if moſt of them proue not ſcoldes they ſhall weare out more ſhooes in Lent then in anie two months beſide through the whole yeere, and get their liuing by walking and crying, becauſe they ſlaundered Ram alley with ſuch a tragical infamie (Nashe sig. B4v). Sugden suggests the fishwives may have harangued the cooks of Ram Alley because they illicitly sold flesh on Fridays or in Lent.

The provision of food is connected with the area’s predatory sexuality, which had been referred to so casually in Barry’s play, in a salacious pamphlet of 1681 called . In the account made of Tom’s sexual attacks upon London women, there features one on the Woman that cries hot Gray Peaſe about the Streets, coming up Ram Alley in Fleete-ſtreet ( sig. A1v). Having laid on her his cold hand, she loſt all power of Reſiſtance, and along with it her peas, which she had afterwards to ſcrape up her Ware as well as ſhe could, for the uſe of ſuch longing Ladies as are affected with ſuch Diet ( sig. A1v).

As well as food and drink, the area was also known for another popular vice in the early modern capital, the smoking of tobacco—the supplying or indulgence of which habit was often found unacceptable by the members of the legal profession whose property abutted the alley. The Parish of St. Dunstan in the West’s wardmote register of 1630 records one such offence: Item, we present Timothy Howe (of Ram Alley, Fleet Street) and Humfry Fenne for annoying the Judges at Serjeants Inn with the stench and smell of their tobacco (, 1630 qtd. in Bell 274). Bell continues to quote the wardmote from 1618 which combined complaints about drink with those against tobacco. The register laid complaint against Timothy Louse and John Barker, of Ram Alley, for keeping their tobacco shoppes open all night and fyers in the same without any chimney and suffering hot waters [spirits] and selling also without licence, to the great disquietness and annoyance of that neighbourhood (, 1618 qtd. in Bell 274).

Finally, in , John Day and his collaborator, Henry Chettle, make use of the alley’s fame as a place of popular recreation. Disguised as a Maſter of the Motion or puppet-master, Canby promises his customers, Tom Strowd and Swash, you ſhall likewiſe ſee the amorous conceits and Love ſongs betwixt Captain Pod of Py-corner, and Mrs. Rump of Ram-alley (Day sig. G1v-G2r). Sugden notes that Captain Pod was a well-known exhibitor of puppet shows, and that it may be presumed Mrs. Rump was equally historical.

The modern day Hare Place remains an alleyway cutting through to the Inner Temple from Fleet Street, and appropriately emerging next to a wine merchant.